It is freezing cold outside and I need a new pair of winter boots. Well this girl looks so warm I think I’ll buy a pair of Uggs. I could never understand advertisements like this one. The girl is clearly really hot and the boots cost about 400$ so they must be really hot too, but why the need for no clothes? Aren’t they winter boots? This advertisement is or at least should be aimed towards women since they are the ones buying the shoes. I would much rather see her in a nice pair of long johns and a sweater sporting what it looks like an outfit I might be wearing with the boots.
Is practically out these days? To be in touch with high fashion women either have to be completely uncomfortable or naked? This is a very nice shot, beautiful actually yet I am suppose to be wanting to buy the bathing suit to wear to the beach. I would have to walk around trying not to move a muscle in fear of breaking my bathing suit and being naked. But oh, I guess then I would be in high fashion wouldn’t I?
On the runway fashion tends to be a bit extreme. I have always wondered if these designers actually sell the outrageous outfits they produce and who buys them? They are more works of art then anything else but why don't we call them works of art? I found this last image and I questioned how she even walked down the runway in her outfit.
Is this what women will be wearing in 2050?
1 comment:
"Is this what women will be wearing in 2050?" it seems women are already wearing these type outfits in 2008. an interesting question, though: what will men and women be wearing in 2050?
Post a Comment